Court finds owners of apartments opposite Tate face unacceptable level of intrusion
The owners of luxury flats opposite the Tate Modern’s viewing gallery face an unacceptable level of intrusion that prevents them enjoying them homes, the supreme court has ruled.
In a majority judgment, the court determined that the flat owners faced a “constant visual intrusion” that prevented them from enjoying their properties.
Noting that visitors to the Tate’s viewing gallery, which is currently closed, photograph the interiors and post this on social media, Lord Leggatt said: “It is not difficult to imagine how oppressive living in such circumstances would feel for any ordinary person – much like being on display in a zoo.”
The case involves five owners of four apartments in the Neo Bankside development on the South Bank of the Thames taking action against the Tate over the estimated 500,000 visitors looking into their homes from the viewing platform 34 metres away. The platform, which opened in 2016, provides a panorama of London as well as a direct view into their glass-fronted flats.
I appreciate the depth and breadth of knowledge you bring to this topic. Your articles are always informative and insightful.
Your article was informative and easy to read. Thank you for presenting the information in a way that’s easy to understand.
This is a well-written and insightful article. Your talent for making complex topics easy to understand is commendable.
Great article! I really enjoyed reading it and appreciate the insights you shared.